Global AI Governance: Status Quo, Dilemmas, and China's Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67762/y4dy3p59Keywords:
artificial intelligence, global governance, governance dilemmas, China's pathAbstract
Artificial intelligence is a strategic technology leading a new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation. Global artificial intelligence governance refers to the regulation and control of the multifaceted issues involved in the entire process of the research, development and application of artificial intelligence, and it plays a key role in guiding science and technology toward good and in shaping a sustainable global artificial intelligence ecosystem. Taking the current state of global artificial intelligence governance as its starting point, and in view of the current dilemmas—insufficient representativeness in participation, insufficient coordination among governance mechanisms, considerable difficulty in coordinating technical rules, and insufficient release of governance dividends—this paper proposes a framework for global artificial intelligence governance from the aspects of deepening the construction of multilateral cooperation mechanisms, focusing on the formulation of technical safety and ethical standards, attending to the construction of rules for cross-border data flow, and accelerating the fulfillment of artificial intelligence governance commitments, in the hope of providing new ideas for global artificial intelligence governance and of promoting the development of the global artificial intelligence governance system in a more open and inclusive direction.
References
[1]Q. Gao, "Global good intelligence and global collective intelligence: The future of global AI governance," World Economics and Politics, no. 7, 2019.
[2]W. Sun, "Artificial intelligence and the “new alienation” of human beings," Social Sciences in China, no. 12, 2020.
[3]Q. Wu, "U.S. artificial intelligence counter-terrorism: Paths, motivations and challenges," Social Sciences in Xinjiang, no. 3, 2022.
[4]Q. Wu, "Technology for good: The core essence and theoretical value of China’s global AI governance initiative," Peace and Development, no. 5, 2024.
[5]Y. Bu, "Intelligence leading the future: The realistic dilemmas of global AI governance and the Chinese solution," Contemporary Economic Management, pp. 1-19, 2025.
[6]Q. Gao, "Artificial intelligence, the fourth industrial revolution and the international political and economic landscape," Contemporary World and Socialism, no. 6, 2019.
[7]N. Han and X. Dong, "The trust dilemma in global AI security governance and the path to resolving it," International Forum, no. 6, 2024.
[8]K. Jia and Y. Jiang, "Three basic issues in AI governance: Technological logic, risk challenges and public policy choices," Chinese Public Administration, no. 10, 2017.
[9]Y. Han, F. Zhang, and J. Peng, "Order reconstruction: Global economic governance under the impact of artificial intelligence," World Economics and Politics, no. 1, 2023.
[10]H. Zheng, "Trustworthy artificial intelligence: The governance basis of AIGC under technological ethical risks," Science & Technology Progress and Policy, pp. 1-11, 2025.
[11]X. Guo, "Challenges to global AI governance in the era of large models and the Chinese solution," Scientific Research, pp. 1-15, 2025.
[12]Y. Luo, "The transmutation of sovereignty in the digital age and the reshaping of the international security order," Global Review, no. 6, 2024.
[13]E. Calvano, G. Calzolari, V. Denicolò, et al., "Artificial intelligence, algorithmic pricing, and collusion," American Economic Review, vol. 110, no. 10, 2020.
[14]L. G. Pinheiro, "Protocols of production: The absent factories of digital capitalism," American Political Science Review, pp. 1-14, 2024.
[15]G. Yan and H. Xin, "Power interaction and balanced competition: An international political economy analysis of digital power competition among China, the United States and Europe," Global Review, no. 6, 2024.
[16]J. Zhao, "Upholding the fundamentals and innovating in international law: From the perspective of the normative needs of the transformation of the global governance system," Social Sciences in China, no. 5, 2021.
[17]H. Wu, "Institutional arrangements and legal regulation in the era of artificial intelligence," Legal Science (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), no. 5, 2017.
[18]T. Que and J. Zhang, "New trends in the U.S. artificial intelligence strategy and their global impact," Foreign Affairs Review (Journal of China Foreign Affairs University), no. 3, 2020.
[19]H. Ma, L. Li, B. Sheng, et al., "The impact of global intelligent production on China’s trade and welfare," The Journal of World Economy, no. 9, 2024.
[20]R. Liu and W. Xiong, "International competition, standardization strategies and the EU’s technological power," Pacific Journal, no. 9, 2024.
[21]T. Wu and H. Liu, "The geoeconomic turn, digital sovereignty and EU artificial intelligence governance," Journal of International Security Studies, no. 5, 2024.
[22]N. Yang, "The weaponization of artificial intelligence and the future of cyber deterrence strategy," Journal of International Security Studies, no. 5, 2024.
[23]X. Chen and Y. Liu, "The impact of digital diplomacy on the contest for international discourse power and China’s response," Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition, no. 5, 2024.
[24]Y. Li and H. Li, "A comparative study of artificial intelligence regulatory norms in Europe, the United States and China," Contemporary World and Socialism, no. 5, 2024.
[25]P. Ru, J. Su, Z. Han, et al., "Intelligence leading the future: The social impact of generative artificial intelligence and its standardized governance," E-Government, pp. 1-13, 2025.
[26]Z. Zhi, "Contributing a Chinese solution to the international governance of the Internet," Red Flag Manuscript, no. 2, 2016.
[27]Z. Wu and Z. Dong, "The transformation of the international system and the reform of global governance," Nankai Journal (Philosophy, Literature and Social Science Edition), no. 1, 2018.
[28]F. Zhang and J. Yang, "Coordinated governance or divide and rule: A systemic analytical framework for global governance," World Economics and Politics, no. 3, 2021.
[29]Y. Quan and R. Zhang, "New-quality governance capacity: Institutional innovation in China’s initiative under the tension of global AI governance," Media Observer, no. 11, 2024.
[30]W. Yin, "Critique and reconstruction: The inherent defects of the global governance system and its transformative turn," Socialism Studies, no. 5, 2021.
[31]D. Acemoglu and P. Restrepo, "Demographics and automation," The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 89, no. 1, 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Artificial Intelligence Technology and Application

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.